On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 23:17:13 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The stats collector is on by default (of course, that doesn't apply to
make installcheck...)
By doing appropriate changes to your installation I guess you can
break almost every test ;-)
Oh I see now, nice. I
Neil Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 11:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Uh, how do you force the stats collector to 'on' before the test is
run?
The stats collector is on by default (of course, that doesn't apply to
make installcheck...)
Oh I see now, nice. I didn't realize you could turn
Christoph Dalitz wrote:
@Bruce:
---
Could you please already remove the WIN32_CONSOLE and OemToChar/CharToOem stuff
from psql? Sorry for the inconvenience generated by my ignorance.
Removed. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL
I haven't seen a notice that Bruce noticed this patch I sent across general as
part of a rambling thread of mine. There again, I'm not exactly up to date with
all my email so could easily have missed it. However, in light of the beta3
notice I'm sending it to the correct list now.
Fixes simple
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I hadn't seen this --- not sure why.
Probably because it was in a rambling thread consisting mostly of posts by
myself.
Thanks for applying it chaps.
Nigel
(Sheesh, all this fuss for a one character change :)
---(end of
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
I hadn't seen this --- not sure why.
Probably because it was in a rambling thread consisting mostly of posts by
myself.
Thanks for applying it chaps.
I might have assumed the tsearch guys had it handled now that they
I hadn't seen this --- not sure why.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
o adds a configure option --without-spinlocks to allow
non-spinlock compiles
--disable-spinlocks please.
I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
...
I might have assumed the tsearch guys had it handled now that they have
CVS access.
Good point. I'd completely forgotten I was also expecting them to pick it up,
principally because it needs to be applied to the version for running with a
7.3
Tom Lane wrote:
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce sent me a copy of the patch, and it BREAKS UnixWare (If y'all=
=20
care).
Unfixably? Or just a small oversight?
I'm actually not worried about platforms that are actively being tested.
It's the stuff that hasn't
10 matches
Mail list logo