Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I think this is the patch I like. It does the auto-detect handling as I
hoped. I will just do the doc updates to mention it.
My only issue is that this is per-connection, while I think you have to
create a global variable that defaults to false, and
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tom Lane wrote:
I don't think we need to complicate pqsignal's API for this. Instead
we'd better document that SIGPIPE handling has to be set up and kept
stable before doing any libpq operations in a multithread app.
Not reliable.
An app could install it's own signal handler and block SIGPIPE
You can send it to me to test. I've duplicated the reported behavior
here so I can test the fix. (Ideally, send me a url to downloaded it
from rather than attaching it.)
Just a thought, a corresponding option of --batch/-B could be added to do
the opposite of the --interactive/-I option.
I will write the psql.sgml changes.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Claudio Natoli wrote:
For src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c and src/include/c.h
(Note: should ioctlsocket_ret be initialized to 1 for BEOS too, and can it
take an unsigned parameter? If so, could simplify.)
OK, I have updated this for 7.4 and CVS. Any idea why it
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Claudio Natoli wrote:
If this is
Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
Yes, that's correct. (strictly, at the time of creation, I was working off
the WIN32_DEV branch...)
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
a
Claudio Natoli wrote:
Of course, this only applied to head, no 7.4.
Yes, that's correct. (strictly, at the time of creation, I was working off
the WIN32_DEV branch...)
OK. You said you had some backend/Makefile stuff too. Please check CVS
head first because I dealt with ln -s and some
Patch applied to HEAD and 7.4CVS. Thanks.
---
Stephan Szabo wrote:
Here's a patch that adds some text mentioning that
RESTRICT is not deferrable to the create table reference
page.
Content-Description:
[ Attachment,
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this to be applied to CVS HEAD?
It sounded like large portions were still at the request-for-comment
stage...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is
11 matches
Mail list logo
