Re: [PATCHES] ISO year.

2003-12-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:33:44PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > + DCH_I, ^^^ > DCH_, > DCH_YYY, > DCH_YY, There is a bug.. it's wrong position. Please, add the "enum" of DCH_I to same position as you have "I" in next array. It means "enum"

Re: [PATCHES] ISO year.

2003-12-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 11:41:18AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > This patch allows you to use I as format specifier to get the > > ISO year, the year correspondeing to the ISO week number (IW). > > The purpose of to_char() as I understand it is to be 100%

Re: [PATCHES] ISO year.

2003-12-19 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > DCH_IW, > + DCH_IYYY, > + DCH_IYY, > + DCH_IY, > + DCH_I, It's better :-) This patch is OK for me. Karel -- Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/ ---(end o

Re: [PATCHES] [GENERAL] restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted

2003-12-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2003 21:45 schrieb Tom Lane: > The aclchk change looks okay if that's the behavior you want, but I > wonder why you don't just make it raise error in both the GRANT and > REVOKE cases. Yes, that seems better. > The pg_dump change looks okay for the 7.4 branch. It will

[PATCHES] distinguish between all and "all" in pg_hba.conf

2003-12-19 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The minimal disturbance change might be to teach the parser to distinguish between a quoted 'all' and an unquoted 'all', and forget the '*' idea. Probably we ought to go with that, on backwards-compatibility grounds. OK, here

Re: [PATCHES] distinguish between all and "all" in pg_hba.conf

2003-12-19 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The minimal disturbance change might be to teach the parser to distinguish between a quoted 'all' and an unquoted 'all', and forget the '*' idea. Probably we ought to go with that, on backwards-compatibility grounds.

Re: [PATCHES] ISO year.

2003-12-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Karel Zak wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 08:18:08PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > DCH_IW, > > + DCH_IYYY, > > + DCH_IYY, > > + DCH_IY, > > + DCH_I, > > It's better :-) This patch is OK for me. Which patch is OK? The one attached? You looked like you were making changes to this pa

Re: [PATCHES] ISO year.

2003-12-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 07:14:53PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Which patch is OK? The one attached? You looked like you were making > changes to this patch in your later emails. That is the changed/good patch. Kurt ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [PATCHES] ISO year.

2003-12-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2003

Re: [PATCHES] distinguish between all and "all" in pg_hba.conf

2003-12-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
That IPv6 cleanup is major! > ! hostall all ::1 > :::::::trust > ! hostall all ::1/128 trust Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: