Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:08AM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > There is no zero calendar year. The first year of Anno Domini is 1. It's
> > ordinal, not cardinal.
>
> I agree. But the follow quoted code is not use in date_part() there
> Kurt found bug. It's used in
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:08AM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > There is no zero calendar year. The first year of Anno Domini is 1. It's
> > ordinal, not cardinal.
>
> I agree. But the follow quoted code is not use in date_part() there
> Kurt found bug. It's used in
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:37:07PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:12:08AM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
> > > There is no zero calendar year. The first year of Anno Domini is 1. It's
> > > ordinal, not cardinal.
> >
> > I agree. But the follow quoted
