Re: [PATCHES] fix for pg_dump (caused by array output syntax changes)

2004-09-07 Thread Weiping
This isn't going to be applied because pg_dump is not broken ... at least not against CVS tip. You apparently are running a pre-beta backend that numbered ACL entries from zero. Got it: The code are up-to-date, but I didn't initdb, so the system catalog didn't update thus the pg_dump broken. t

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] Win32 deadlock detection not working for Postgres8beta1

2004-09-07 Thread Magnus Hagander
> > [ fix broken CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS macro ] > > Applied. I see how this might change detection of > statement_timeout, but I do not actually see what it's got to > do with deadlock detection. > In the deadlock situation the process that needs to wake up > is going to be blocked on a semaphor

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] Win32 deadlock detection not working for Postgres8beta1

2004-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How does this fix that case? > It doesn't. This is why the second version of the patch was required, > per http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-09/msg00039.php. Okay, I've applied the right version of the patch now ;-)