Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I propose to add the following to the plperl docs, following recent
problems.
comments?
cheers
andrew
Index: plperl.sgml
The argument of SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave at _bt_check_unique
might be not correct. When the next page is checked, I think that
the argument is not buf but nbuf.
regards,
--- Atsushi Ogawa
*** ./src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c.orig 2005-10-13 00:59:55.599839064 +0900
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If this were a Postgres problem I'd agree with you. But it isn't, really
- it's a Perl problem, which is properly documented in the Perl docs, to
which this note refers.
Well, it's really a problem with our implementation of pl/perl. I don't
Atsushi Ogawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The argument of SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave at _bt_check_unique
might be not correct. When the next page is checked, I think that
the argument is not buf but nbuf.
You are right --- thanks for finding this!
regards, tom lane
As discussed on -hackers:
Patch to test performance for lwlock structure padding for 8.1beta
This patch is only expected to show improvement on larger SMP systems
where there is considerable lwlock activity, on related lock types
e.g. multiple backends doing tight nested loop joins at the same
In the UPDATE documentation, indeterminacy is misspelled as
indeterminancy.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=indeterminacy
--
Michael Fuhr
Index: doc/src/sgml/ref/update.sgml
===
RCS file:
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
If this were a Postgres problem I'd agree with you. But it isn't, really
- it's a Perl problem, which is properly documented in the Perl docs, to
which this note refers.
Well, it's really a problem with our implementation of pl/perl. I don't think
it's
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the UPDATE documentation, indeterminacy is misspelled as
indeterminancy.
Fixed, thanks.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
