[PATCHES] [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort

2006-04-15 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
Tiny patch to Makefile.shlib to reduce noise created by tsearch. All it does is remove duplicates. The behaviour itself is not changed. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/ Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent

Re: [PATCHES] Documentation patch: change a name in a grammar rule to prevent confusion

2006-04-15 Thread Nicolas Barbier
2006/4/15, Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 01:59 +0200, Nicolas Barbier wrote: the following patch changes parameter to gucname in the grammar (and later references) for the SET syntax in ALTER ROLE and ALTER USER. Wouldn't var_name, varname, or something similar be

[PATCHES] plpython improvements

2006-04-15 Thread Sven Suursoho
1) named parameters additionally to args[] 2) return composite-types from plpython as dictionary 3) return result-set from plpython as list, iterator or generator Test script attached (patch-test.sql) but not integrated to plpython test-suite. -- Sven Suursoho patch-test.sql Description:

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort

2006-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes: Tiny patch to Makefile.shlib to reduce noise created by tsearch. All it does is remove duplicates. The behaviour itself is not changed. What cases exactly does that fix ... and are you sure it doesn't break anything? Personally I've been

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort

2006-04-15 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes: Tiny patch to Makefile.shlib to reduce noise created by tsearch. All it does is remove duplicates. The behaviour itself is not changed. What cases exactly does that fix ... and are

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort

2006-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes: On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:12:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Personally I've been wondering for some time why we use lorder/tsort at all. Are there any platforms we support where this is still needed? (Given the existence of circular references

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump insert transactions

2006-04-15 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch makes pg_dump wrap insert dumps (-d, -D) in a transaction to speed the restore process. What's the point of this, compared to Simon's recent patch adding an option to wrap the whole output in one big transaction? An

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Reduce noise from tsort

2006-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: Well, I vote we take it out, which would eliminate these warnings instead of just shorten them. On a platform where tsorting a non-shared library's contents is actually essential, libpq.a would be useless anyway because of the circular internal references. Presumably, anyone who's

Re: [PATCHES] Documentation patch: change a name in a grammar rule

2006-04-15 Thread Nicolas Barbier
2006/4/15, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: s/prominently/at all/ ... I don't think the proposed patch is an improvement, and in fact see nothing wrong with the use of parameter here. If we want to abandon parameter as the official documentation term for GUC variables, then there are dozens or