Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I think we are ready to move forward with this. Please supply an
updated patch ready for application. Thanks.
I'm still not very happy with the size/invasiveness of that patch.
Nor am I.
FWIW, Red Hat's legal department
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:21:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I think we are ready to move forward with this. Please supply an
updated patch ready for application. Thanks.
I'm still not very happy with the size/invasiveness of that patch.
I think
Forgot the patch...
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:01:38PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
snip
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
Index: configure
Index: configure.in
Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed in
five minutes using links on the developer's page,
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/testing.
---
Chris Browne wrote:
An article at WebProNews quoted
Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed in
five minutes using links on the developer's page,
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/testing.
---
Joachim Wieland wrote:
Is there any reason, why
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Momjian schrieb:
This patch cannot be applied. 'active_simple_exprs' is referenced but
not defined. I think the new variable name is 'simple_eval_estate',
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Dave Page wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrus
Sent: 08 May 2006 18:16
To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
I went to test this patch and got the attached regression failures.
Please repair and resubmit. Thanks.
---
Jaime Casanova wrote:
On 4/30/06, Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/29/06, Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks.
Borland CC also needed this change, so I modified your patch appropriately.
---
Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Dear Bruce san.
I neglected sufficient test before a release.:-(
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Bernd Helmle wrote:
Currently we don't record any dependencies between namespaces and
conversions.
This looks inconsistent to me, since we have dependencies on all other
objects that live
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
Fix a format warning in fd.c when FDDEBUG is on.
By the way (to save a thread): What's the rationale of designing resowner
APIs like this:
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks.
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 17:29 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
Lock file to prevent starting with multiple archivers present.
Possibly some debate over
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Patch applied. Thanks.
I wish to object to this patch; it's poorly designed, poorly coded, and
badly documented. The philosophy seems to be I want this feature
and I don't care what I have to do to the semantics and performance
of plpgsql to get it.
OK, patch reverted, and attached. Would the author please revise?
Thanks.
It seems like a cool feature.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Patch applied. Thanks.
I wish to object to
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
Here's a weaker version of the previous patch. Rather than aborting, it
simply prints a warning about any unrecognised options,
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
This was a suggestion made back in March that would dramatically reduce
the overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE on queries that loop
Simon, I understand this is only for the 8.1.X and 8.0.X branches. I am
hesitant to put something in back branches when the main branch does not
have this functionality. I will hold the patch until we are sure where
the head branch is going.
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
Per feedback, here is an updated version. As was pointed out, the prior
version was checking stuff that either changed too often
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
It seems like a cool feature.
The fundamental problem with it is that plpgsql isn't designed to deal
with dynamically changing data types. The patch as submitted contained
some hacks that sort of dealt with this in some cases (I don't think it
Tom Lane wrote:
FWIW, Red Hat's legal department thinks that the FSF has overreached
in claiming that the GPL is incompatible with OpenSSL's license. Which
is why Red Hat isn't worrying about GPL apps that use OpenSSL, of which
there are quite a few ...
I'm quite happy if we hang onto Red
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The patch was now hanging around more than 9 months,
and it was already accepted during the
original discussion by Neil Conway.
Nonsense. I provided some specific code cleanup suggestions and said that
I didn't object to the general feature. That should not be taken as
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Patch applied. Thanks.
I hadn't gotten around to reviewing the revised version. Just to let
you know, I'm going to remove the separate header file pgmagic.h and
put the macro into fmgr.h as I'd suggested originally. The reason is
that the separate
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Patch applied. Thanks.
I hadn't gotten around to reviewing the revised version.
Is it just me or is this happening a lot lately?
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I hadn't gotten around to reviewing the revised version.
Is it just me or is this happening a lot lately?
That security stuff took up a *lot* of time behind the scenes :-(
Normality is returning, slowly.
No, the author would not.
Tom did participate in the discussion at the time
when the original patch was developed.
The patch was now hanging around more than 9 months,
and it was already accepted during the
original discussion by Neil Conway. Please figure out
by yourselves who might be the one
25 matches
Mail list logo
