""Charles Duffy"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> We came up with this patch in response to a problem reported to us by a
> client. They had a query which took an unacceptably long time to respond
> to a cancel request (SIGINT). The client uses 8.1.4, so the patch is
> against that.
>
How long is th
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really an
> optional thing for an MUA to follow?
The relevant RFC would be 2822.
If mailers have started ignoring reply-to it would be *because* of lists that
set it. In the presen
Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2006 23:01 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> One exception is that we can't do that with full vacuums. The reason is
> that full vacuum may want to run user-defined functions to be able to
> index the tuples it moves. This isn't a problem normally, except in the
> case where the fun
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:57 -0400, Marko Kreen wrote:
>> Few cleanups and couple of new things:
>>
>> - add SHA2 algorithm to older OpenSSL
>> - add BIGNUM math to have public-key cryptography workon
>> non-OpenSSL build.
>> - gen_random_bytes() function
>
> I'll appl
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 21:19, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 'k, isn't the Reply-To header part of an RFC somewhere? Or is it really
> an optional thing for an MUA to follow?
Well I didn't even seen the reply-to in the email when it came across. So that
may be one problem. But just as a note I found
This is a revised patch originated by Junji TERAMOTO for HEAD.
[BTree vacuum before page splitting]
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-01/msg00301.php
I think we can resurrect his idea because we will scan btree pages
at-atime now; the missing-restarting-point problem went away.
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:57 -0400, Marko Kreen wrote:
> Few cleanups and couple of new things [...]
Applied, thanks for the patch.
BTW, the following text from README.pgcrypto is no longer accurate,
right? (circa line 42 in HEAD)
"Without OpenSSL, public-key encryption does not work, as pgcrypto
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:57 -0400, Marko Kreen wrote:
>> Few cleanups and couple of new things [...]
> Applied, thanks for the patch.
This has broken two out of the four buildfarm members that reported
in the last half hour :-( I think kudu does not like
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 00:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This has broken two out of the four buildfarm members that reported
> in the last half hour :-( I think kudu does not like // comments,
> not sure what kookaburra is on about.
BTW, you've switched your animal names :) I fixed the C++-style comm
