Re: [PATCHES] pgstattuple extension for indexes

2006-08-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: Hi all, Here is a patch to add pgstatindex functions to the pgstattuple module, which can work with 8.1.4. Please review and try it. Thanks. Huh, I bet it works with 8.1.4, but it doesn't work on CVS HEAD: /pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c: In

Re: [PATCHES] pgstattuple extension for indexes

2006-08-12 Thread Satoshi Nagayasu
Alvaro, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Huh, I bet it works with 8.1.4, but it doesn't work on CVS HEAD: /pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c: In function 'GetBTPageStatistics': /pgsql/source/00orig/contrib/pgstattuple/pgstatindex.c:182: error: 'BTItem' undeclared (first use in

[PATCHES] ECPG regress tests fix for VPATH builds

2006-08-12 Thread Alvaro Herrera
This patch allows ECPG to build on a VPATH build. I didn't commit it just because I don't have a non-VPATH build to make sure it still works ... -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. Index:

Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

2006-08-12 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2006-08-12 kell 10:59, kirjutas Tom Lane: Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 10:57, kirjutas Tom Lane: Insert points to the next byte to be written within the internal WAL buffers. The byte(s) preceding it haven't necessarily

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] New variable server_version_num

2006-08-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
David Fetter wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:14:16PM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: Today on IRC David Fetter and some others were discussing version numbers and we realized that although libpq now provides the version of Postgres as a number, this is still a wheel that is being

Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

2006-08-12 Thread Hannu Krosing
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 10:57, kirjutas Tom Lane: Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 12:56, kirjutas Simon Riggs: Methinks it should be the Write pointer all of the time, since I can't think of a valid reason for wanting to know where

Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived

2006-08-12 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-08-09 kell 10:57, kirjutas Tom Lane: Insert points to the next byte to be written within the internal WAL buffers. The byte(s) preceding it haven't necessarily gotten out of those buffers yet. Write points to the end of