Recovery can occur with/without same setting of wal_checksum, to
avoid
complications from crashes immediately after turning GUC on.
Surely not. Otherwise even the on setting is not really a
defense.
Only when the CRC is exactly zero, which happens very very rarely.
It
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 11:01 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
What's the use-case for changing the variable on the fly anyway? Seems a
better
solution is just to lock down the setting at postmaster start.
I guess that the use case is more for a WAL based replicate, that
What's the use-case for changing the variable on the fly anyway?
Seems a
better
solution is just to lock down the setting at postmaster start.
I guess that the use case is more for a WAL based replicate, that
has/wants a different setting. Maybe we want a WAL entry for the
Hi,
We're running out of infomask bits in the tuple header. I bumped into
this as I tried to apply both the phantom command ids patch, and the HOT
patch simultaneously. They both require one infomask bit, so they
conflicted.
This has been discussed before; I think the best approach is to
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe it would actually be even better to combine the t_natts and
t_infomask fields to a single 32-bit infomask field.
That's not happening, because the alignment is wrong ...unless maybe
we switch this field to fall before t_ctid, but that
Ok, so when you need CRC's on a replicate (but not on the master)
you
turn it
off during standby replay, but turn it on when you start the
replicate
for normal operation.
Thought: even when it's off, the CRC had better be computed for
shutdown-checkpoint records. Else there's no way
On Windows, if logged in as an Administrator, 'make check' fails with our
standard error, saying:
quote
Execution of PostgreSQL by a user with administrative permissions is not
permitted.
The server must be started under an unprivileged user ID to prevent
possible system security compromises.
This patch removes double-quotes from around the listen_addresses=%s part; I
couldn't find a way of doing that. But then, the questions is, can the %s
(hostname) have spaces embedded in it?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com
On 1/6/07, Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Windows, if logged in as an Administrator, 'make check' fails with
our standard error, saying:
quote
Execution of PostgreSQL by a user with administrative permissions is not
permitted.
The server must be started under an unprivileged user ID to prevent
possible
cool...
On 1/6/07, Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh wrote:
On Windows, if logged in as an Administrator, 'make check' fails with
our standard error, saying:
quote
Execution of PostgreSQL by a user with administrative permissions is not
permitted.
The server must be
Here is an updated updated XML patch. Unless there are objections of
the sort that this approach is totally wrong or there is crash
potential, I'd like to get this committed this week and fill in the
gaps next year.
Peter - I have a few quick questions about the XML patch that you
s/XMLGEN/XMLAGG/
Sorry, I meant XMLAGG() not XMLGEN()
-- Korry
Here is an updated updated XML patch. Unless there are objections of
the sort that this approach is totally wrong or there is crash
potential, I'd like to get this committed this week and fill in the
gaps
Here's a new version that takes into account the SELECT INTO TEMP case. Thanks
Jaime!
What other temporary objects do you think should be considered?
Any other comments on the patch?
A Dijous 04 Gener 2007 05:33, Jaime Casanova va escriure:
On 12/27/06, Albert Cervera Areny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have created the following patch based on your description of how to
get BCC compiled. Please let me know how it works against a stock
PostgreSQL 8.2.X and I can include the patch in 8.2.2. Sorry it didn't
make it in time for 8.2.1.
Tom Lane wrote:
Log Message:
---
Put back ERANGE test in dpow(). There are platforms that need this,
like my HPPA ...
It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow? I would prefer:
else if (errno == ERANGE !isinf(result))
because the sign computation isn't 100%, think pow(-1e300, 2)
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
Ok, so when you need CRC's on a replicate (but not on the master) you
turn it
off during standby replay, but turn it on when you start the replicate
for normal operation.
Which sounds to me like a good reason to allow the option in
On Jan 3, 2007, at 4:20 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
* trace_temp_files is now an int: -1 disables, 0 and up equate to
log if
the file is this size or larger
Another thought is to allow ignoring files over a certain size. The
reason is that if you end up creating 10MB of temp files, you can
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch removes double-quotes from around the listen_addresses=%s part; I
couldn't find a way of doing that. But then, the questions is, can the %s
(hostname) have spaces embedded in it?
Yes, because it can be more than one hostname. Why do you want
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow? I would prefer:
else if (errno == ERANGE !isinf(result))
No objection to that, just don't take out the ERANGE test altogether
again ;-)
regards, tom lane
Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
Ok, so when you need CRC's on a replicate (but not on the master) you
Which sounds to me like a good reason to allow the option in
recovery.conf as well...
Actually, I'm not seeing the
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It ERANGE's only on Inf, not underflow? I would prefer:
else if (errno == ERANGE !isinf(result))
No objection to that, just don't take out the ERANGE test altogether
again ;-)
Actually, when you return ERANGE, what is
Actually, I'm not seeing the use-case for a slave having a different
setting from the master at all?
My backup server is less reliable than the primary.
My backup server is more reliable than the primary.
Somehow, neither of these statements seem likely to be uttered by
a
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, when you return ERANGE, what is 'result'? Nan? Inf? finite?
I believe it's HUGE_VAL (the largest finite value) ... which is
something I don't want to explicitly test for, any more than I liked
the explicit use of min/max values before. Your
On 1/6/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch removes double-quotes from around the listen_addresses=%s
part; I
couldn't find a way of doing that. But then, the questions is, can the
%s
(hostname) have spaces embedded in it?
Yes, because it
Gurjeet Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1/6/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, because it can be more than one hostname.
But the code in postmaster.c expects the list to be comma separated.
Sure, but SplitIdentifierString allows for whitespace, eg
'host1, host2, host3'
25 matches
Mail list logo
