Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On these questions, we have to find out how Oracle handles it, but
> > your approach seems appropriate.
>
> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
> errors for invalid pattern combinations.
What do we do with other i
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
>> errors for invalid pattern combinations.
> What do we do with other invalid pattern combinations in to_char() now?
Mostly, we return bogus results :-(. T
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
> >> errors for invalid pattern combinations.
>
> > What do we do with other invalid pattern combinations in to_char() now?
>
> Mostly,
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
> >> errors for invalid pattern combinations.
>
> > What do we do with other invali
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > >> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
> > > >> errors for invalid pattern combination
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Brendan Jurd wrote:
> > On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > >> I don't think Oracle even has that. But personally I'd like to see
> > > > >> err
On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Brendan Jurd wrote:
> > On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > >> I don't think Oracle even h
Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Brendan Jurd wrote:
> > > > On 2/15/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > > > Peter Eisentraut w
Victor B. Wagner wrote:
> This patch adds following functionality to PostgreSQL
>
> 1. If PostgreSQL is compiled with OpenSSL version 0.9.7 and above,
> both backend and libpq read site-wide OpenSSL configuration file as
> described in OPENSSL_config functon manual page.
>
> This allows to use h
Never mind, I found the answer:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg01931.php
Working on the patch now.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Victor B. Wagner wrote:
> > This patch adds following functiona
What was the status of this? Was there anything else I needed to do with
this patch, or is it ready to be applied? Let me know if there is
anything else I need to do on this...
--
What this country needs is a good five cent nickel.
---(end of broadcast)-
[resending, with the patch gzipped, as the previous one seems to be lost
-- I mistakenly sent it to -hackers instead of -patches]
Hi,
Here's the autovacuum launcher patch I'm considering for inclusion.
Possibly controversial stuff:
1. I changed InitPostgres to be able to get a database by OID.
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> What was the status of this? Was there anything else I needed to do with
> this patch, or is it ready to be applied? Let me know if there is
> anything else I need to do on this...
I assume it is ready for application.
--
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the autovacuum launcher patch I'm considering for inclusion.
This part is very seriously broken:
diff -c -p -r1.33 lwlock.h
*** src/include/storage/lwlock.h5 Jan 2007 22:19:58 - 1.33
--- src/include/storage/lwlock.h13 F
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:49 -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> What was the status of this? Was there anything else I needed to do with
> this patch, or is it ready to be applied? Let me know if there is
> anything else I need to do on this...
Will do -- I'm planning to apply this as soon as I have th
15 matches
Mail list logo