Re: [PATCHES] I want to omit the fopen message of Windows.

2007-02-28 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Hiroshi Saito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this message necessary for setting errno again? AFAIR we only intended that message as a temporary measure until we'd figured out why things seemed to be failing on Windows. If there's no

Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch

2007-02-28 Thread Zoltan Boszormenyi
Hi, I think now this is really the final version. Changes in this version is: - when dropping a column that's referenced by a GENERATED column, the GENERATED column has to be also dropped. It's required by SQL:2003. - COPY table FROM works correctly with IDENTITY and GENERATED columns -

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread korryd
Not that I think that anyone owning both a law degree and a computer in 2007 should legitimately be able to plead innocence here. FAST Australia's lawyers are making themselves look like idiots, and the same for every other company tacking on such notices. I think the real bottom line

[PATCHES] Updated Packed Varlena (relative to CVS post SET_VARSIZE changes)

2007-02-28 Thread Gregory Stark
I've updated the patch against Tom's recent commit of the SET_VARSIZE changes. It's about 40% the size it was before, most of the remaining patch is actually heaptuple.c and tuptoaster.c which is the key code. http://community.enterprisedb.com/varlena/patch-varvarlena-13.patch.gz I had fixed

Re: [PATCHES] I want to omit the fopen message of Windows.

2007-02-28 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:04:58AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:20:01AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Hiroshi Saito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this message necessary for setting errno again? AFAIR we only intended that message as a temporary measure until we'd

Re: [PATCHES] POSIX Shared memory, revised, again

2007-02-28 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM -0800, Chris Marcellino wrote: So I've finished reformulating this patch to use the device/inode instead of the hash idea I had earlier. I have tested this patch (on Darwin) to permit the postmaster to recover after a crash or killing, and it will not

Re: [PATCHES] POSIX Shared memory, revised, again

2007-02-28 Thread Chris Marcellino
Messages with PDF's seem to be dropped as Magnus described yesterday. It is in this tarball though: http://homepage.mac.com/cmarcellino/postgres-posix-shmem.tar As Tom has said a few times, there is an issue with the need to keep two different lifecycles of postmasters and backends out of

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added this to the developer's FAQ to clarify the situtation of posting a patch: liPostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL Global Development Group the non-revokable right to

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: I have added this to the developer's FAQ to clarify the situtation of posting a patch: liPostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote: I have added this to the developer's FAQ to clarify the situtation of posting a patch: liPostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL Global Development Group the

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Joshua D. Drake wrote: We should add this to the mailing list signup pages and the welcome pages to the lists. Yep, good idea. Marc? For -patches and -hackers, I agree. It seems a bit legalistic and off-putting for the general lists, though.

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] pg_get_domaindef

2007-02-28 Thread FAST PostgreSQL
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:10, Bruce Momjian wrote: Hi, Following up this patch with a contribution statement. 'With permission from the Managing Director, Fujitsu Australia Software Technology, I am granting the PostgreSQL Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute the source

Re: [PATCHES] Split _bt_insertonpg to two functions

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [PATCHES] Fast COPY after TRUNCATE bug and fix

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [PATCHES] lo_truncate

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [PATCHES] xpath_array with namespaces support

2007-02-28 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric patch to add special-case representations for 8 bytes

2007-02-28 Thread Gregory Stark
Patric Bechtel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe you want to have a look here: http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal/DPDecimal.html Well we're not really looking for the optimal packing in general. All the problems here have to do with convenience in the implementation rather than the problems

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread FAST PostgreSQL
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:28, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have added this to the developer's FAQ to clarify the situtation of posting a patch: liPostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL Global

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES]

2007-02-28 Thread Joshua D. Drake
FAST PostgreSQL wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 04:28, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have added this to the developer's FAQ to clarify the situtation of posting a patch: liPostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric patch to add special-case representations for 8 bytes

2007-02-28 Thread Patric Bechtel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Stark schrieb am 01.03.2007 10:23: Patric Bechtel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe you want to have a look here: http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal/DPDecimal.html Well we're not really looking for the optimal packing in general. All the

Re: [PATCHES] lo_truncate

2007-02-28 Thread Kris Jurka
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote: Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. Here's a patch that works with

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?

2007-02-28 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have coded up the following patch which places LOG just above ERROR in log_min_error_statement. LOG_NO_STATEMENT? What *are* you thinking? The kindest word I can find for this is baroque. What I had in mind was a one-line patch: if

Re: [PATCHES] Numeric patch to add special-case representations for 8 bytes

2007-02-28 Thread Patric Bechtel
Michael Glaesemann schrieb am 01.03.2007 12:41: On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:32 , Patric Bechtel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Stark schrieb am 01.03.2007 10:23: Patric Bechtel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe you want to have a look here: