Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [80k patch]
Surely there is a whole lot of unintended noise in this patch?
I certainly don't believe that you meant to change keywords.c
for instance.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgr
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 03:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [80k patch]
>
> Surely there is a whole lot of unintended noise in this patch?
> I certainly don't believe that you meant to change keywords.c
> for instance.
Removed, thanks.
Unrelated to this patc
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Reviewers, please let me know if you find problems with the
> patches. If none, I would like to commit this weekend.
Given that everyone who has tested this has found a different way to
crash it, and that the frequency of crash reports shows no signs of
s
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:55:37PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>
> Thanks for the report. Here is the new patches from Yoshiyuki.
Thanks for the patch :)
Now, I get a different problem, this time with the following code
intended to material
> Now, I get a different problem, this time with the following code
> intended to materialize paths on the fly and summarize down to a
> certain depth in a tree:
>
> CREATE TABLE tree(
> id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
> parent_id INTEGER REFERENCES tree(id)
> );
>
> INSERT INTO tree
> VALUES (1,
