Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Incrementally Updated Backup

2006-09-21 Thread Csaba Nagy
> True, but running several dozen instances on a single machine will > require a lot more memory (or, conversely, each individual database gets > a lot less memory to use). > > Of course, this is all hand-waving right now... it'd be interesting to > see which approach was actually better. I'm run

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree

2006-07-26 Thread Csaba Nagy
> [snip] (In fact, it's > trivial to see how user-defined functions that are mislabeled immutable > could make this fail.) So retail vacuum without any cross-check that > you got all the index tuples is a scary proposition IMHO. Wouldn't work to restrict that kind of vacuum to only tables which h