Re: [PATCHES] Win32 pg_autovacuum service

2004-05-11 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 May 2004 12:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 pg_autovacuum service I thought pg_autovacuum was moving to be integrated with and controlled by the backend, in which case this seems

Re: [PATCHES] Moving pg_autovacuum from contrib to src/bin

2004-05-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 May 2004 09:44 To: Matthew T. O'Connor Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Moving pg_autovacuum from contrib to src/bin It is supposed to be linked into the postmaster and forked from

Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander Sent: 14 June 2004 21:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check The patch makes the if user is admin check on win32 abort startup, similar to unix.

Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 June 2004 09:16 To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check snip Oh, and I notice the use of the PowerUsers group - iirc, there is no such group on NT4

Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 June 2004 14:58 To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can't run Postgres securely would be a more

Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Matthew T. O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 6/15/2004 4:06 PM To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; Magnus Hagander; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check I have been working on integrating pg_autovacuum into the backend, and I

Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 June 2004 19:11 To: Dave Page Cc: Magnus Hagander; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check So? I don't follow why run it as a service isn't a sufficient answer, and indeed

Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 June 2004 22:28 To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] stderr win32 admin check Dave Page wrote: you can only run one instance as a service on a single

Re: [PATCHES] pg_ctl service integration for WIN32

2004-06-16 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claudio Natoli Sent: 16 June 2004 14:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCHES] pg_ctl service integration for WIN32 Here's a rough first cut, close to application state but not a finished

Re: [PATCHES] pg_ctl service integration for WIN32

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 June 2004 02:00 To: Dave Page; Claudio Natoli; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PATCHES] pg_ctl service integration for WIN32 Dave Page writes: Looks OK to me at a quick glance. One thought though

Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review

2004-06-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Momjian Sent: Sat 6/19/2004 1:05 AM To: Andreas Pflug Cc: Tom Lane; Gavin Sherry; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review We can build a gui on top of the command-line tool, no? No, we

Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review

2004-06-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 6/19/2004 6:40 PM To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Dave Page; Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review Well, whatever you call slow or not slow. I checked it; connecting 10

Re: [PATCHES] eventlog fix

2004-06-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 19 June 2004 20:03 To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Bruce Momjian; Laurent Ballester; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] eventlog fix Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We

Re: [PATCHES] eventlog fix

2004-06-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 June 2004 22:49 To: Dave Page Cc: Magnus Hagander; Bruce Momjian; Laurent Ballester; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] eventlog fix Hm, that is a lot ... but wouldn't the sort of people interested

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Cannot initdb in cvs tip

2004-06-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 June 2004 00:22 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cannot initdb in cvs tip Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm getting the following error when trying to initdb with CVS

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Cannot initdb in cvs tip

2004-06-20 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: John Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 6/20/2004 2:27 AM To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cannot initdb in cvs tip you could of course rmdir /s /q $PGDATA mkdir $PGDATA if the purpose

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL

2004-06-20 Thread Dave Page
this patch - dunno if he has a different version of sys/stat.h... Anyway, regardless of that I think the patch is relevant. Regards, Dave. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page Sent: 19 June 2004 23:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL

2004-06-22 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2004 15:40 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Compile failure with SSL I had made the same changes as you to be_secure...(actually, I recently stopped

Re: [PATCHES] pg_tablespace_databases

2004-06-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Pflug Sent: 28 June 2004 12:25 To: PostgreSQL Patches Subject: [PATCHES] pg_tablespace_databases From an idea of Bruce, the attached patch implements the function

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Initdb error

2004-07-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander Sent: 06 July 2004 21:46 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [HACKERS] Initdb error Hi! I'm getting this error whenever I try to change the superuser of my database to anything

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Function to kill backend

2004-07-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 July 2004 04:46 To: Dave Page Cc: Magnus Hagander; Bruce Momjian; Josh Berkus; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Function to kill backend If you don't mind plastering a use at your own risk

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Cannot initdb in cvs tip

2004-07-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 July 2004 09:29 To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cannot initdb in cvs tip Dave, now that we are nearing beta, I think we need to correct

Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib

2004-07-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 July 2004 18:41 To: Andreas Pflug Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL Patches; Dave Page Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce Momjian wrote: So, I

Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib

2004-07-31 Thread Dave Page
It's better than no patch I think. /D -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 7/31/2004 5:33 AM To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Admin functions contrib Do people want the server file logging

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 tablespace

2004-08-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Pflug Sent: 05 August 2004 20:23 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 tablespace Bruce Momjian wrote: Andreas Pflug wrote: The attached patch

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 tablespace

2004-08-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2004 11:07 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 tablespace Since NT4 isn't supported by M$ for quite some time now, it seems reasonable to mark

[PATCHES] Win32 Event log

2004-08-12 Thread Dave Page
Under Win32 it is normal for serious errors to be recorded to the systems event log as well as any log that the application may also be writing (SQL Server is a good example of an app that does this). The attached patch directs FATAL and PANIC elog's to the event log as well as their normal

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log

2004-08-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 August 2004 15:40 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Event log Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch directs FATAL and PANIC elog's to the event log

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 8.0 Beta 1 // Environment Vars // .pgpass

2004-08-18 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 18 August 2004 03:59 To: Andrew Dunstan Cc: Joerg Hessdoerfer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] 8.0 Beta 1 // Environment Vars //

[PATCHES] Service control enhancements

2004-08-24 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch improves pg_ctl's win32 service code to eliminate some possible causes of the stale postmaster.pid problem that some users have reported. - The service did not properly report that it accepts SERVICE_CONTROL_SHUTDOWN events, thus it's possible the SCM simply killed the

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 August 2004 14:59 To: Tom Lane Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid Ok, if you say so :-) I had the general impression we wanted that. But then let's go

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Service startup delay

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2004 02:44 To: Max Dunn Cc: Dave Page; 'Barry Lind'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Service startup delay Another issue is that when installing the Postgres service

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2004 15:43 To: Dave Page Cc: Magnus Hagander; Tom Lane; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid Should we (if only for the sake

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid

2004-08-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 August 2004 16:24 To: Dave Page Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Magnus Hagander; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

[PATCHES] pg_autovacuum service fixes

2004-09-01 Thread Dave Page
Hi, The attached patch addresses the following issues with the WIn32 service code in pg_autovacuum. Please apply. - Add documentation. - Use the main PostgreSQL message dll when logging to the application log. - Set the -P (port) option correctly when installing as a service. Regards, Dave

[PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-09-01 Thread Dave Page
Evening committers, Any ideas when Magnus' win32 version numbering patch is likely to get applied? Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-09-02 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 September 2004 09:47 To: Bruce Momjian; Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: RE: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch But I can send the same patch again. Line 398 should probably be + PGFILEDESC

[PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32.

2004-09-08 Thread Dave Page
The Win32 installer cannot easily handle 'copy from stdin' thus preventing execution of scripts that use copy. Tsearch2 appears to have the only script that does this - the attached patch changes the copy to a bunch of INSERTs. Regards, Dave tsearch2.sql.in.diff Description:

Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32.

2004-09-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 15:14 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32. While I have no particular objection to adjusting the tsearch2 script, why has the installer got

Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32.

2004-09-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 15:49 To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32. I was about to mention trapping errors as being a likely weak spot of custom

Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32.

2004-09-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 17:17 To: Tom Lane Cc: Magnus Hagander; Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32. Not to mention someone putting a \ command in the install

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Contrib modules on Win32

2004-09-08 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2004 19:15 To: Dave Page Cc: PgSQL Win32 developers; PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Contrib modules on Win32 Dave Page wrote: cube seg patch attached. Compiles

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken

2004-09-11 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 September 2004 17:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dave Page; PgSQL Win32 developers Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken Now that I think of it, flex will not work because

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken

2004-09-13 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 September 2004 14:59 To: Dave Page Cc: PgSQL Win32 developers; PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken How does your Win32 system rename prototype differ from what

Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32.

2004-09-14 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 September 2004 05:00 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Tsearch2 update for Win32. Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Win32 installer cannot easily handle 'copy from stdin

Re: [PATCHES] libpq.dll on win32

2004-10-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Magnus Hagander Sent: 11 October 2004 21:05 To: pgsql-patches Subject: [PATCHES] libpq.dll on win32 * Adds required functions to libpqdll.def and libpqddll.def. This includes the functions

Re: [PATCHES] libpq.dll on win32

2004-10-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 12 October 2004 01:38 To: Magnus Hagander Cc: pgsql-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq.dll on win32 Also, I count 3 *.def files to be fixed, not two. (We really oughta

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Static build of libpq fails

2004-10-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 October 2004 02:08 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Static build of libpq fails Dave Page wrote: Hi, I tried building a static libpq

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Static build of libpq fails

2004-10-13 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 October 2004 10:52 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL Cygwin mailing list Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Static build of libpq fails I was able to reproduce

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken

2004-09-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 September 2004 23:58 To: Dave Page Cc: PgSQL Win32 developers; PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken I have fixed this issue with Dave's help. Hmm, not entirely

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken

2004-09-28 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page Sent: 28 September 2004 12:06 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PgSQL Win32 developers; PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] VC++ psql build broken - The crash I was seeing last

Re: [PATCHES] SSL on win32

2004-09-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2004 23:00 To: PostgreSQL-patches Cc: Dave Page Subject: SSL on win32 Hello! Here is a patch to fix win32 ssl builds. Summary of changes: snip I'd appreciate it if one of the win32

[PATCHES] Win32 fix for miscinit.c

2004-10-04 Thread Dave Page
Tom's recent patch to improve stale lockfile detection included a call to getppid() which doesn't exist on Windows. There is no clean way to implement one (previously discussed on hackers-win32) hence the attach patch simply #ifdefs out the call. Please apply ASAP as the win32 build is currently

[PATCHES] FW: Win32 fix for miscinit.c

2004-10-04 Thread Dave Page
More haste, less speed... Patch attached this time! /D -Original Message- From: Dave Page Sent: 04 October 2004 14:41 To: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Win32 fix for miscinit.c Tom's recent patch to improve stale lockfile detection included a call to getppid() which doesn't

[PATCHES] Win32 libpq/ssl fix

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Page
The Win32 (mingw) build of libpq seems to have lost it's SSL libs from the link step resulting in a build failure. The attached patch fixes that. Please apply asap. Thanks, Dave libpq_ssl.patch Description: libpq_ssl.patch ---(end of

[PATCHES] Win32 VERSIONINFO fix

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Page
Unfortunately some re-jigging of Magnus' Win32 version patch broke the build by introducing some un-escaped double quotes into sed commands. The attached patch escapes those quotes without removing the re-jigging that was done. Regards, Dave. filedesc.diff Description: filedesc.diff

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 VERSIONINFO fix

2004-10-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 October 2004 15:27 To: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: RE: [PATCHES] Win32 VERSIONINFO fix Unfortunately some re-jigging of Magnus' Win32 version patch broke the build by introducing

[PATCHES] Win32 psql fix

2004-10-18 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch fixes psql's win32 frontend-only build, by using pg_strcasecmp in variables.c, and #ifdef'ing out PostmasterPid in miscadmin.h. Please apply. Regards Dave. psql.diff Description: psql.diff ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 psql fix

2004-10-19 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 October 2004 18:37 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 psql fix Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached patch fixes psql's win32 frontend-only build, by using

Re: [PATCHES] pg_autovacuum vacuum cost variables patch

2004-10-26 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew T. O'Connor Sent: 26 October 2004 06:40 To: pgsql-patches Subject: [PATCHES] pg_autovacuum vacuum cost variables patch Please review and if deemed accecptable, please apply to CVS

Re: [PATCHES] psql \! WIN32 cleanup

2004-11-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane Sent: Sat 11/6/2004 5:30 AM To: Bruce Momjian Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] psql \! WIN32 cleanup Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The attached applied patch tests for COMSPEC in the right place

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] pg_autovacuum in 8beta-dev3 small bug

2004-11-27 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 27 November 2004 04:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: PostgreSQL Win32 port list; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] pg_autovacuum in 8beta-dev3

Re: [PATCHES] pg_resetxlog as root

2004-12-12 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Conway Sent: 12 December 2004 22:57 To: pgsql-patches Subject: [PATCHES] pg_resetxlog as root I suppose a similar fix is needed for Win32? If so, pgwin32_is_admin() would be the natural

Re: [PATCHES] pg_resetxlog as root

2004-12-13 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 December 2004 03:59 To: Dave Page Cc: pgsql-patches Subject: RE: [PATCHES] pg_resetxlog as root On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 23:59 +, Dave Page wrote: Sounds reasonable to me. Attached is a patch

Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile

2005-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: 07 January 2005 05:33 To: Andrew Dunstan Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile This has been saved for the 8.1 release:

Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile

2005-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 January 2005 15:14 To: Dave Page Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile I am not in favor of removing those makefiles in 8.1 unless they become more

Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile

2005-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 January 2005 16:25 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Dave Page; Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile more of a pain. If people are submitting patches it means

Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile

2005-01-07 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 January 2005 17:07 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; Andrew Dunstan; Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Don't feel that it's on your head to keep them working. The project's

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-20 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Massa Sent: 20 January 2005 13:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release I am trying to install pg_autovacuum as a win32

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-20 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Harald Massa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 January 2005 16:07 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release Dave, thank you very much for fixing

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-21 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page Sent: 20 January 2005 15:29 To: Harald Massa; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum

2005-01-21 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page Sent: 21 January 2005 13:20 To: Harald Massa; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum -Original Message

[PATCHES] pg_autovacuum Win32 Service startup delay

2005-01-24 Thread Dave Page
When starting as a service at boot time on Windows, pg_autovacuum may fail to start because the PostgreSQL service is still starting up. This patch causes the service to attempt a second connection 30 seconds after the initial connection failure before giving up entirely. Regards, Dave

Re: [PATCHES] pg_autovacuum Win32 Service startup delay

2005-01-27 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 January 2005 23:58 To: Dave Page Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pg_autovacuum Win32 Service startup delay Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: When starting as a service

[PATCHES] Micro doc patch

2005-05-13 Thread Dave Page
Add missing quotes. Index: docguide.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/docguide.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.55 diff -u -r1.55 docguide.sgml --- docguide.sgml 9 Apr 2005 03:52:43 - 1.55 +++

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding.

2005-05-24 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 24 May 2005 15:17 To: Ian FREISLICH Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] pg_autovacuum commandline password hiding. Ian FREISLICH [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCHES] Server instrumentation

2005-06-10 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: 10 June 2005 14:52 To: Andreas Pflug Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Server instrumentation pg_file_stat() pg_file_length() pg_file_read() pg_file_write()

[PATCHES] Default database patch

2005-06-20 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch modifies initdb to create a default database called 'postgres' when the cluster is initialised. Documentation updates are included, including updates to relevant examples to encourage users to use this database in place of template1. I have not modified utilities like createuser

Re: [PATCHES] Default database patch

2005-06-20 Thread Dave Page
Attached is an updated version of this patch which /does/ update utilities to use the postgres database by default, per comments on -hackers. Regards, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page Sent: 20 June 2005 13:07

[PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-28 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch integrates dbsize functions into the backend, as per discussion on -hackers. The following functions are included: pg_relation_size(text) - Get relation size by name/schema.name pg_relation_size(oid)- Get relation size by OID pg_tablespace_size(name) - Get tablespace size

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size(). I'm not against that one, but I

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:29 To: Bruce Momjian; Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Maybe pg_trait_size() or pg_property_size() will do? I

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Michael Glaesemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 10:01 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration I'm still unclear as to what exactly is trying to be captured

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-06-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 14:41 To: Dave Page Cc: Michael Glaesemann; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: Thanks Michael

Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-02 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 July 2005 21:30 To: Bruce Momjian Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Is a new version of this patch coming? Yup, attached. Per

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2005 17:10 To: Dawid Kuroczko Cc: Andreas Pflug; Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dawid Kuroczko [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2005 14:54 To: Dave Page Cc: Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration Dave Page dpage@vale

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-04 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Robert Treat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2005 18:21 To: Dave Page Cc: Tom Lane; Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-05 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2005 02:39 To: Robert Treat Cc: Bruce Momjian; Dave Page; Tom Lane; Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend integration

2005-07-06 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 July 2005 04:11 To: Tom Lane Cc: Dave Page; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Robert Treat; Dawid Kuroczko; Andreas Pflug; PostgreSQL-patches; PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Dbsize backend

Re: [PATCHES] Updated instrumentation patch

2005-07-30 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane Sent: Sat 7/30/2005 4:58 PM To: Magnus Hagander Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Updated instrumentation patch None of these functions are getting into 8.1 anyway; we should be designing the long-term

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2005 03:26 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page wrote: [Resent as the list seems to have rejected yesterdays attempt

[PATCHES] Win32 Thread Safety

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch updates the thread test program to run stand-alone on Windows. The test itself is bypassed in configure as discussed, and libpq has been updated appropriately to allow it to build in thread-safe mode. To apply, apply the patch as normal, then rename

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2005 14:47 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page wrote: -Original Message

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

2005-08-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2005 15:05 To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch Dave Page wrote: pg_dir_ls isn't necessary

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

2005-08-25 Thread Dave Page
It, or some related patch appears to have broken the build on buildfarm member snake. I haven't had time to investigate. /D -Original Message- From: Bruce Momjianpgman@candle.pha.pa.us Sent: 25/08/05 01:14:54 To: Tom Lane[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Andrew Dunstan[EMAIL PROTECTED], Chuck

[PATCHES] Bug in file access functions

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Page
The attached patch fixes a couple of minor issues in the file access functions added for 8.1. These seem to have been introduced in recent changes following the original patch. 1) Stop them rejecting paths that use Windows backslash directory seperators. 2) Allow absolute paths to files into the

Re: [PATCHES] Bug in file access functions

2005-08-29 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 August 2005 20:15 To: Dave Page Cc: PostgreSQL-patches Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Bug in file access functions Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: 1) Stop them rejecting paths that use Windows backslash

Re: [PATCHES] Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation

2005-10-01 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Tom Lane[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01/10/05 16:28:18 To: Bruce Momjianpgman@candle.pha.pa.us Cc: Dave Pagedpage@vale-housing.co.uk, Peter Eisentraut[EMAIL PROTECTED], PostgreSQL-patchespgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Making pgxs builds work with a

Re: [PATCHES] Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation

2005-10-02 Thread Dave Page
builds work with a relocated installation Dave Page dpage@vale-housing.co.uk writes: Unfortunately quoting either way didn't work on Windows/msys when Thomas I were looking at this. Yech. So we need the GetShortName hack on Windows even if we quote for other platforms? Yep :-(. /D

  1   2   >