On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:19:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
Joshua,
On 7/21/05 7:53 PM, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I know that isn't true at least not with ANY of the Dells my
customers have purchased in the last 18 months. They are still really,
really slow.
I found I needed the enclosed patch when configuring today's CVS - I haven't
been keeping up since 8.2beta3.
The first part I needed when configuring --with-libxml. Why go to the
effort of finding xml2-config, and then disbelieve what it tells you?
The second part is a shell quoting problem. As
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:16:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The thing is, if xml2-config is meant to give the flags necessary to
compile a programme with libxml, then why pick-and-choose which flags
you are going to use?
Well, if they gave the flags
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 03:41:57PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Should a library we are using really be able to set the rpath for us? Are
there any other libraries that do that?
After further thought, I should use the libxml2.la which libxml does
install by default - libtool knows what the
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:35:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
The other thing that's a bit strange here is the reference to
libpthread --- does libxml2 really depend on that? I'd definitely
advise against linking libpthread into the backend if you can
avoid it.
Just out of curiosity, why should
