> Dave Page wrote:
> Err, I missed this earlier - we had discussed getting rid of all
the
> VC++ & Borland makefiles for 8.1. With Mingw now working they are a > little redundant now, and Bruce & I (and probably others) had to jump > through hoops to keep them working this release. Admittedley that pain > will probably be less in the future, but still, they are a pita to > maintain (especially Borland as no-one seems to have the compiler > anyway!) I have VC++ and have been using it to compile my libpq.dll files since PG
6.5.
Has anyone compared the DLL files using Mingw and using VC++ in terms of
size and speed on win32? I'm not sure if there's any huge difference but would
hate to have VC++ support for compiling the DLLs dropped without that
knowledge.
I'd be happy to provide VC++ compiled DLLs for Mingw and VC++ if anyone
would like to try them. I suppose I could also code some sort of test program in
C and do the tests myself.
Not sure if this has been discussed already. I'd hate to be re-visting
someone else's attempt.
-Tony |
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Tony and Bryn Reina
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Dave Page
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Bruce Momjian
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Dave Page
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Bruce Momjian
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Dave Page
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Dave Page
- Re: [PATCHES] pg_config MSVC makefile Bruce Momjian