i would say have both, but just mention that for performance reasons its better to use triggers.
On Nov 29, 2007 8:29 PM, Michael Paesold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NikhilS wrote: > >> The argument I made for keeping the example around is not > > dependent on > >> the assumption that using a rule is a good idea. It's dependent on > >> the established fact that we have recommended that in prior > >> releases, and therefore people are going to be seeing that > >> construct in real databases. > > > > And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation > > for it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch: > > > > <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please > > refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note> > > > > +1 > > I would also add another sentence about *why* the recommendation was > changed. We have one rule-based setup here, and it has been working > flawlessly for us,... so personally I don't even know the reasons. > > Best Regards > Michael Paesold > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Usama Munir Dar Consultant Architect Cell:+92 321 5020666 Skype: usamadar
