Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The attached patch appears to solve the problem. However, while it
makes us conform to the first sentence below from the docs, it doesn't
comply with the second. Not sure what to do about that. Maybe there's
a better solution?
Attached patch seems much better, I think.
c
[redirecting]
I have abstracted this problem, and we definitely have a newline bug
that has to be fixed, IMNSHO.
Attached are 2 scripts that are identical except that one has DOS-style
line endings and one has Unix style line endings. The DOS-style just
fails miserably with no warning. It's not
