On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 04:57:52PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 08:20 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > The previous discussion showed that there is a wide diversity of
> > opinions on what The Right Delimiter and The Right NULL String(TM)
> > are.
>
> Barring a more convincing j
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 08:20 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> The previous discussion showed that there is a wide diversity of
> opinions on what The Right Delimiter and The Right NULL String(TM)
> are.
Barring a more convincing justification for why we need this feature,
I'm inclined to side with Tom:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:10:04AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 07:47 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > From the earlier discussion, it appears that there is a variety of
> > opinions on what the COPY delimiter should be in pg_dump. This patch
> > allows people to set it and the
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 07:47 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> From the earlier discussion, it appears that there is a variety of
> opinions on what the COPY delimiter should be in pg_dump. This patch
> allows people to set it and the NULL string.
I'm still not convinced there is a reasonable use-case
Folks,
>From the earlier discussion, it appears that there is a variety of
opinions on what the COPY delimiter should be in pg_dump. This patch
allows people to set it and the NULL string. Thanks to Gavin Sherry
for help with the pointers :)
I didn't patch pg_dumpall, but it would be trivial if