ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I meant a while (sleep 1(or 10) and counter longtime) check for
exit instead of sleep longtime.
Ah; yes, what I was proposing (or thought about proposing, not sure if I
posted it or not) was putting a upper
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I meant a while (sleep 1(or 10) and counter longtime) check for
exit instead of sleep longtime.
Ah; yes, what I was proposing (or thought about proposing, not sure if I
posted it or not) was putting a upper limit of 10 seconds in the sleep
I've fixed all other problems according to suggestions, including adding
a SignalSomeChildren(int signal, bool only_autovac) function to
postmaster so that it can shut autovac workers down in case of smart
shutdown.
Tom Lane wrote:
Making InitPostgres's call API vary depending on
Tom Lane wrote:
I forgot to comment:
This part is very seriously broken:
diff -c -p -r1.33 lwlock.h
*** src/include/storage/lwlock.h 5 Jan 2007 22:19:58 - 1.33
--- src/include/storage/lwlock.h 13 Feb 2007 16:58:41 -
*** typedef enum LWLockId
*** 62,67
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think a warning comment is warranted here -- will include it when I
commit the patch.
I was thinking the same, but didn't want to create a merge problem for
you. Maybe Individual lock IDs end here or some such?
regards, tom
[resending, with the patch gzipped, as the previous one seems to be lost
-- I mistakenly sent it to -hackers instead of -patches]
Hi,
Here's the autovacuum launcher patch I'm considering for inclusion.
Possibly controversial stuff:
1. I changed InitPostgres to be able to get a database by OID.
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's the autovacuum launcher patch I'm considering for inclusion.
This part is very seriously broken:
diff -c -p -r1.33 lwlock.h
*** src/include/storage/lwlock.h5 Jan 2007 22:19:58 - 1.33
--- src/include/storage/lwlock.h13 Feb
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The launcher is a dummy process; it never connects to any database.
... Eventually this will need to
be changed so that the launcher tells the worker exactly what table to
work on.
I detect a certain lack of clarity of thinking
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Hmm, I remember eyeballing that code. Would you mind sending me an URL
to that file, or something? Or maybe send me the files themselves?
Sure, here's a patch against current CVS. Please remove all the
functions referencing to buffer and buffer.h to compile.
Remember
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The launcher is a dummy process; it never connects to any database.
... Eventually this will need to
be changed so that the launcher tells the worker exactly what table to
work on.
I detect a certain lack of clarity of thinking here. Either the
10 matches
Mail list logo
