Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Right, just disable with a clear error message.
> >
>
> Forgive me if my earlier reply was not clear: This patch works just the
> same way CREATE INDEX and CREATE TABLE AS SELECT already works:
> - if the server has archive_command set, WAL is written
> - if archive_command
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 16:23 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Writing docs now.
Here's the docs...
Hopefully that explains everything a little betterbut this doc patch
contains a ref to the as yet unapplied --single-transaction patch, but
also explains why that patch exists also.
[Patch via doc/sr
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 08:18 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:51:54AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:03 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Riggs) writes:
> > > > > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Si
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:51:54AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:03 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Riggs) writes:
> > > > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > >> Following patch implements COPY ... FROM
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:03 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Riggs) writes:
> > > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >> Following patch implements COPY ... FROM ... LOCK
> > >
> > > Patch now updated so that it includes an additiona
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 07:51:54AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:03 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Riggs) writes:
> > > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >> Following patch implements COPY ... FROM ... LOCK
> > >
> > > Patch no
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 22:03 -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Riggs) writes:
> > On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Following patch implements COPY ... FROM ... LOCK
> >
> > Patch now updated so that it includes an additional optimization of
> > COPY, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon Riggs) writes:
> On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Following patch implements COPY ... FROM ... LOCK
>
> Patch now updated so that it includes an additional optimization of
> COPY, so that WAL will not be written in the transaction that created
> the
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 12:07 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Following patch implements COPY ... FROM ... LOCK
Patch now updated so that it includes an additional optimization of
COPY, so that WAL will not be written in the transaction that created
the table.
This now gives two fast paths for COPY:
1)
Following patch implements COPY ... FROM ... LOCK as discussed earlier
this year on these threads:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00069.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00075.php
The purpose of the new command is to make an explicit request to ru
10 matches
Mail list logo