>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:27:13 -0600, "Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > > Shinji Teragaito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > >> I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
>> > >> HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
> I see Shinji's patch changed the library suffix
> > > Shinji Teragaito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
> > >> HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
I see Shinji's patch changed the library suffix from .sl to .so for ia64.
Is that is necessary? If so, why?
Thanks,
Ed
--
This has been applied and will be in beta3.
---
Shinji Teragaito wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:39:55 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Shinji Teragaito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I made a patch to l
>> On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 00:39:55 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Shinji Teragaito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
>> HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
> The s_lock change looks good ... but ...
> This patch seems l
Shinji Teragaito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
> HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform.
The s_lock change looks good ... but ...
This patch seems likely to break many other platforms. You do not
seriously expect us to apply t
Hi,
I made a patch to let PostgreSQL work in the LP64 data model on
HP-UX PA-RISC and HP-UX Itanium platform. Also this patch contains
tas code for HP-UX Itanium.
I verified this patch on the following environment and specified as
followings at executing configure script:
* HP-UX 11.
