"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> >
>> > Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered"
>> > append
>> > nodes.
>>
>> Did you ever publish an updated version of this patch?
No, it's been kind of on the back bur
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> >
> > Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append
> > nodes.
>
> Did you ever publish an updated version of this patch?
I don't think so. I think we just need to tell Greg if he should
continue in this direction.
-
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append
> nodes.
Did you ever publish an updated version of this patch?
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Develop
Gregory Stark wrote:
Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append
nodes.
I think it would be better to create completely separate executor node
for this, rather than tack this feature on the regular Append node. The
two don't seem to have much in common. Lookin
Here's the WIP patch I described on -hackers to implemented "ordered" append
nodes.
merge-append-v1.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
---(end