Re: [PATCHES] POSIX Shared memory, revised, again

2007-03-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Ch

Re: [PATCHES] POSIX Shared memory, revised, again

2007-02-28 Thread Chris Marcellino
Messages with PDF's seem to be dropped as Magnus described yesterday. It is in this tarball though: http://homepage.mac.com/cmarcellino/postgres-posix-shmem.tar As Tom has said a few times, there is an issue with the need to keep two different lifecycles of postmasters and backends out of the

Re: [PATCHES] POSIX Shared memory, revised, again

2007-02-28 Thread David Fetter
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:17:44AM -0800, Chris Marcellino wrote: > So I've finished reformulating this patch to use the device/inode > instead of the hash idea I had earlier. > > I have tested this patch (on Darwin) to permit the postmaster to > recover after a crash or killing, and it will not p

[PATCHES] POSIX Shared memory, revised, again

2007-02-27 Thread Chris Marcellino
So I've finished reformulating this patch to use the device/inode instead of the hash idea I had earlier. I have tested this patch (on Darwin) to permit the postmaster to recover after a crash or killing, and it will not permit the postmaster to restart while another postmaster or backends