Re: [PATCHES] PostmasterHandl_patch of win32

2006-07-15 Thread Hiroshi Saito
From: "Tom Lane" "Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Probably, this application will be required. This seems very messy. The correct fix is just to put back the #include line, no? @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include "miscadmin.h" +#include "postmaster/postmaster.h" #include "stor

Re: [PATCHES] PostmasterHandl_patch of win32

2006-07-15 Thread Tom Lane
"Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Probably, this application will be required. This seems very messy. The correct fix is just to put back the #include line, no? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2:

[PATCHES] PostmasterHandl_patch of win32

2006-07-15 Thread Hiroshi Saito
Hi Bruce-san. Uga..., include is removed and it is out of order. pmsignal.c: In function `PostmasterIsAlive': pmsignal.c:121: error: `PostmasterHandle' undeclared (first use in this function) pmsignal.c:121: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pmsignal.c:121: error: for