Applied by Peter.
---
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100cell: +1 415 235 3778
[
Bruce Momjian writes:
Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
That's what I said, that's what I meant.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
That's what I said, that's what I meant.
Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not telling
me what is wrong, so
Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the relivant
parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
David Fetter writes:
Folks,
'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
Cheers,
D
Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts and
creates valid DocBook?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:21:46PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
David Fetter writes:
Folks,
'nother one. Thanks very much, Tom! :)
Cheers,
D
Can you adjust the patch so that it contains only the relevant parts
and creates valid DocBook?
OK. How do I test this? After make
