That covers it extremely well.
cheers
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At the time I wrote the original 2.6 was not out even in prerelease,
which is why I was deliberately somewhat vague about it. It is still in
prerelease, and it will in fact work slightly
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the time I wrote the original 2.6 was not out even in prerelease,
> which is why I was deliberately somewhat vague about it. It is still in
> prerelease, and it will in fact work slightly differently from what was
> in some 2.4 kernels - there are
At the time I wrote the original 2.6 was not out even in prerelease,
which is why I was deliberately somewhat vague about it. It is still in
prerelease, and it will in fact work slightly differently from what was
in some 2.4 kernels - there are 2 settings that govern this instead of
1. Here is
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch makes some improvements to the section of the documentation
> that describes the Linux 2.4 memory overcommit behavior.
Applied. I tweaked some of the wording a bit further.
> I removed the almost content-free assertion that "You will need enou
This patch makes some improvements to the section of the documentation
that describes the Linux 2.4 memory overcommit behavior.
I removed the almost content-free assertion that "You will need enough
swap space to cover your memory needs." If this is intended to
communicate anything meaningful, can
