[PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
If you run make installcheck in contrib it stops on the first module that fails. This is mildly annoying from the point of view of the buildfarm script, which wants to run all the available regression tests. To solve that I implemented a new target that does run them all and only fails at the

Re: [PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you run make installcheck in contrib it stops on the first module that fails. This is mildly annoying from the point of view of the buildfarm script, which wants to run all the available regression tests. Yeah. ISTM that make -k installcheck

Re: [PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you run make installcheck in contrib it stops on the first module that fails. This is mildly annoying from the point of view of the buildfarm script, which wants to run all the available regression tests. Yeah. ISTM that make

Re: [PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you run make installcheck in contrib it stops on the first module that fails. This is mildly annoying from the point of view of the buildfarm script, which wants to run all the available

Re: [PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: I found the following closely-related suggestion in the Make manual. It's not quite there because it doesn't seem to provide a way to pass down the current action (all/clean/install/etc) to the sub-Make. Any ideas how we could do that? I've seen the following idea somewhere:

Re: [PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've seen the following idea somewhere: Looks like you used a variant of this in src/backend/Makefile. Then again, the original proposal doesn't sound so bad either. Well, I'd like a more generic fix that we could apply everywhere, because right now

Re: [PATCHES] new target for contrib/Makefile

2004-09-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Tom Lane wrote: I found the following closely-related suggestion in the Make manual. It's not quite there because it doesn't seem to provide a way to pass down the current action (all/clean/install/etc) to the sub-Make. Any ideas how we could do that? I've seen the