Re: [PATCHES] sign parsing (was: Re: [HACKERS] to_char/to_number loses sign)

2004-10-28 Thread Tom Lane
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem was bigger than I expected. I hope it's fixed in actual > patch. All regression tests pass. Applied, thanks. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -

[PATCHES] sign parsing (was: Re: [HACKERS] to_char/to_number loses sign)

2004-10-27 Thread Karel Zak
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 13:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes, you're right. It strange, but NUM_S missing there. The conversion > > from string to number is less stable part of formatting.c... > > > The patch is in the attachment. > > This patch causes the re