Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-10-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Simon Riggs wrote:

On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:

I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?

I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?

Hmm, let's try this:

Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from 
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!


Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick.


I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is someone 
to actually kill it.  All the talk has been talked, everything has been 
decided, now someone with the right permission bits just turn it off.



--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 Simon Riggs wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
  Bruce Momjian wrote:
  Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
  I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?
  I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?
  Hmm, let's try this:
 
  Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from 
  hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
  
  Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick.
 
 I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is someone 
 to actually kill it.  All the talk has been talked, everything has been 
 decided, now someone with the right permission bits just turn it off.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-10-01 Thread Bruce Momjian

Marc, care to do the honors?

---

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 Simon Riggs wrote:
  On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
  Bruce Momjian wrote:
  Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
  I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?
  I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?
  Hmm, let's try this:
 
  Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from 
  hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
  
  Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick.
 
 I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is someone 
 to actually kill it.  All the talk has been talked, everything has been 
 decided, now someone with the right permission bits just turn it off.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-10-01 Thread Joshua Drake
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:05:00 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Marc, care to do the honors?

KILL IT!! :P

 
 ---
 
 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
  Simon Riggs wrote:
   On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
   Bruce Momjian wrote:
   Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
   I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?
   I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?
   Hmm, let's try this:
  
   Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate
   from hackers, shout now (with rationale)!
   
   Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to
   stick.
  
  I think what we need now, for patches, ports, and the others, is
  someone to actually kill it.  All the talk has been talked,
  everything has been decided, now someone with the right permission
  bits just turn it off.
 


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/



-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-10-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bruce Momjian wrote:
 
 Marc, care to do the honors?
 

Note:

1. there are several lists to kill, not just pgsql-patches.  The
database says:

 pgsql-chat
 pgsql-benchmarks
 pgsql-hackers-win32
 pgsql-hackers-pitr
 pgsql-cygwin
 pgsql-ports

2. The archives must, obviously, survive the kill, and still be
fetchable via rsync to the archives server.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-30 Thread Simon Riggs

On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 Bruce Momjian wrote:
  Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
  I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?
  
  I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?
 
 Hmm, let's try this:
 
 Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from 
 hackers, shout now (with rationale)!

Kill it now, long enough before the next patchfest for it to stick.

-- 
 Simon Riggs   www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




Hmm, let's try this:

Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!


Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?

--
 Thanks

   Bernd

--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Bernd Helmle wrote:
 --On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hmm, let's try this:

 Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
 hackers, shout now (with rationale)!

 Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?

pgsql-hackers

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Heikki Linnakangas

Bernd Helmle wrote:
--On Donnerstag, September 11, 2008 15:39:01 +0300 Peter Eisentraut 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!


Seems i've missed something, what's then supposed to hold patches now?


Just send them to pgsql-hackers.

--
  Heikki Linnakangas
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-17 Thread Bernd Helmle
--On Mittwoch, September 17, 2008 22:37:29 +0300 Heikki Linnakangas 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Just send them to pgsql-hackers.


Oh, that's fine, since discussions are already moved from -patches and are 
continued there. The only disadvantage i see is that -hackers is a little 
more frequented than -patches, but that isn't something which can't be 
managed with some intelligent filtering.


So +1 from my side, if that counts.

--
 Thanks

   Bernd

--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:

I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?


I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?


Hmm, let's try this:

Anyone who thinks the patches list should remain as separate from 
hackers, shout now (with rationale)!


--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


Re: [PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
 I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?

I was wondering the same thing.  Peter?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches


[PATCHES] still alive?

2008-09-03 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
I thought -patches was supposed to die. What happened?

-- ams

-- 
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches