Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> This should apply cleanly to cvs tip.
>
> I've not changed any malloc/calloc to palloc. It looks to me that these memory
> areas are for the lifetime of the backend
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
> >
> > http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
>
> Are you sure Bruce? I'd say this is bug fixing.
>
> Although it doesn't fix the underlying cause of the fault it d
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
>
> http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
Are you sure Bruce? I'd say this is bug fixing.
Although it doesn't fix the underlying cause of the fault it does cover the
specific fault generated a
This has been saved for the 7.5 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
---
Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> This should apply cleanly to cvs tip.
>
> I've not changed any malloc/calloc to palloc. It l
This should apply cleanly to cvs tip.
I've not changed any malloc/calloc to palloc. It looks to me that these memory
areas are for the lifetime of the backend and in the interests of not breaking
something that's not broken I left alone.
Note for anyone reading this and wanting it for tsearch-v2
