Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Kevin Grittner wrote:
I've been working on an improved archive_command shell script that I
expect to submit for comments and potential inclusion in the
documentation as a better base for other people to
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Kevin Grittner wrote:
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive directory and doing a mv to the
archive location when the copy is successfully completed. I think
that this
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need a more reliable way of detecting that a file has been
fully copied.
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
- or maybe provide a .bat file or perl script that would work as na
archive_command on Windows.
We're not talking about archive_command. We're talking about the thing
that copies files to the directory that pg_standby polls.
Er, that's
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
- or maybe provide a .bat file or perl script that would work as na
archive_command on Windows.
We're not talking about archive_command. We're talking about the thing
that copies files to the directory that pg_standby
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Kevin Grittner wrote:
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive directory and doing a mv to the
archive location when the copy is successfully completed. I think
that this even works on Windows. Could that just be
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Kevin Grittner wrote:
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive directory and doing a mv to the
archive location when the copy is successfully completed. I think
that this even works on Windows.
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote:
reviewing your patch
Current status is this:
* My understanding is that Dave and Andrew (and therefore Simon) think
the approach proposed
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I thought the latest conclusion was that changing the behavior of
pg_standby itself wouldn't address the problem anyway, and that what we
need is just a docs patch recommending that people use safe copying
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 16:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I thought the latest conclusion was that changing the behavior of
pg_standby itself wouldn't address the problem anyway, and that what we
need is
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote:
1. Issues with applying the patch to CVS HEAD:
For me, the patch applies cleanly to CVS HEAD.
I do notice that there are two files standby.sgml and
pgstandby.sgml. I can't see where standby.sgml comes from, but I
haven't created it;
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote:
8. Unresolved question of implementing now/later a cp replacement
The patch implements what's been agreed.
I'm not rewriting cp, for reasons already discussed.
Not a comment to you Martin, but it's fairly clear that
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need a more reliable way of detecting that a file has been
fully copied.
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive directory and doing a mv to the
archive location when the
Kevin Grittner wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We really need a more reliable way of detecting that a file has been
fully copied.
In our scripts we handle this by copying to a temp directory on the
same mount point as the archive directory
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 21:38 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:19 -0700, Martin Zaun wrote:
8. Unresolved question of implementing now/later a cp replacement
The patch implements what's been agreed.
I'm not rewriting cp, for reasons
15 matches
Mail list logo
