Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 16:32 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I think a command line options is better and required.
>
> I think we need more proof of that than a use case involving taking
> screen shots.
I've just explained my points as a reply to Tom's mail.
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > We have the same options with reindexdb, for example.
>
> reindexdb and friends inherited that option from psql. On a green
> field, they probably wouldn't have it. psql has more complex
> semantics, so it's not clear whether that's the same t
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> We have the same options with reindexdb, for example.
reindexdb and friends inherited that option from psql. On a green
field, they probably wouldn't have it. psql has more complex
semantics, so it's not clear whether that's the same thing.
> I think a command line opti
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:22 +0200, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > What's wrong with just sending stdout to /dev/null? If that eats
> error
> > messages too then we should probably fix initdb to send those to
> > stderr.
>
> We have the same
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:28 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> What's wrong with just sending stdout to /dev/null? If that eats error
> messages too then we should probably fix initdb to send those to
> stderr.
We have the same options with reindexdb, for example. I think a command
line op
