Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I always wondered why the Redhat init scripts thought it was a clever idea to
> redirect the output to /dev/null. It seems like a pessimal user interface
> choice. Every time I have to work with a Redhat machine where Postgres isn't
> starting up the first t
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 11:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Attached is a patch which adds --quiet and --q option to initdb.
> > >
> > > Why is this a good idea?
> >
> > I was playing wi
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 11:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Attached is a patch which adds --quiet and --q option to initdb.
> >
> > Why is this a good idea?
>
> I was playing with 8.2 RPM init script and thought that inst
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 11:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Attached is a patch which adds --quiet and --q option to initdb.
>
> Why is this a good idea?
I was playing with 8.2 RPM init script and thought that instead of
directing the output to /dev/nul
Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch which adds --quiet and --q option to initdb.
Why is this a good idea?
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space
