Tom Lane wrote:
> Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Should I send a new patch with only the regression tests?
>
> Yeah, if you think they are worth adding.
Regression part of NULL patch applied.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should I send a new patch with only the regression tests?
Yeah, if you think they are worth adding.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 11:33:24 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can someone explain what was broken?
COPY FROM removed backslashes before comparing the input to the
external null representation. (It had a hard-wired special code path
that allowed \N to be recognized.) The text
Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:31:30 +0200, I wrote:
> >There haven't been too much changes in this area between 7.3 and 7.4.
>
> Here is the patch for 7.3.4 ...
>
> Bruce, I noticed that the original patch submission didn't contain
> anything useful as a cvs log message:
>
> Mak
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 11:31:30 +0200, I wrote:
>There haven't been too much changes in this area between 7.3 and 7.4.
Here is the patch for 7.3.4 ...
Bruce, I noticed that the original patch submission didn't contain
anything useful as a cvs log message:
Make COPY FROM a bit more compatible with C
Manfred Koizar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a patch that does this and adds a few regression tests.
Uh, I did that already ... for 7.4 at least.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ign
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 19:12:50 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>it seems we have to compare the null representation string to the
>pre-debackslashing input.
Here is a patch that does this and adds a few regression tests.
>(This is probably fairly easy to make happen
>in CVS tip, but it m
