Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] bytea, index and like operator again and detailed report

2003-12-06 Thread Joe Conway
Alvar Freude wrote: -- Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please try the attached patch and let me know how it works for you. It is against cvs HEAD, but should apply OK to 7.4. so, I checked it with my database. It looks good, all checks I made are OK. The attached fixes the bytea-like bug

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] bytea, index and like operator again and detailed report

2003-12-06 Thread Tom Lane
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ! *prefix_const = string_to_bytea_const(match, match_pos); ! *rest_const = string_to_bytea_const(rest, pattlen - match_pos); I think that should be pattlen - pos not pattlen - match_pos, no? Otherwise it looks reasonable ...