Merlin Moncure wrote:
On 8/31/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
works fine (here was my test). thank
On 8/31/07, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
> >
> > Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
>
> works fin
On 8/31/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
>
> Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
works fine (here was my test). thanks for quick resolution to this
issue. st
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a patch (minus catalog bump) which I think does that.
Looks sane in a very quick once-over, but I didn't test it.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: You can
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew's idea of using the enum ordinal value would meet that test, but
at least with the current layout of pg_enum it would be quite expensive
to do the conversion in either direction --- you'd have to fetch
multiple catalog rows. I think we'd have to add another column showi
