darnit!
patch attached.
(Thinks - do we need to worry about suid sgid and sticky bits on data dir?)
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just noticed tonight that the new initdb introduced a subtle change of
behavior. I use a shell script to automate the process
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
darnit!
patch attached.
(Thinks - do we need to worry about suid sgid and sticky bits on data dir?)
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
darnit!
patch attached.
Applied with correction (you got the return-value check backwards)
and further work to deal reasonably with error conditions occurring
in check_data_dir.
Tom applied it before I could.
--
Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
darnit!
patch attached.
Applied with correction (you got the return-value check backwards)
and further work to deal reasonably with error conditions occurring
in check_data_dir.
darnit again.
I'm taking a break - my head is
