Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > darnit!
> > patch attached.
>
> Applied with correction (you got the return-value check backwards)
> and further work to deal reasonably with error conditions occurring
> in check_data_dir.
Tom applied it before I could.
--
Bruc
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> darnit!
>
> patch attached.
>
> (Thinks - do we need to worry about suid sgid and sticky bits on data dir?)
>
> andrew
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Joe Conway <[EMAIL
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> darnit!
> patch attached.
Applied with correction (you got the return-value check backwards)
and further work to deal reasonably with error conditions occurring
in check_data_dir.
regards, tom lane
---(e
darnit!
patch attached.
(Thinks - do we need to worry about suid sgid and sticky bits on data dir?)
andrew
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just noticed tonight that the new initdb introduced a subtle change of
behavior. I use a shell script to automate the process
