Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

2004-11-17 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I take this as confirmation that calling pg_usleep is the Right Thing (tm). Here's the patch. Applied. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] pg_arch.c call to sleep()

2004-11-08 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Magnus Hagander wrote: We have the following warning on Windows: pgarch.c:349: warning: implicit declaration of function `sleep' To fix it we could include the right header (which appears to be stdlib.h in the Windows/Mingw case), or we could replace the call by a call to