Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I modified pg_regress.c to use just the return code to determine if the
> > diff worked, but I added in a WIN32-specific test for the file size. I
> > think that is the cleanest solution. Attached.
>
> It really needs a comment, alo
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I modified pg_regress.c to use just the return code to determine if the
> diff worked, but I added in a WIN32-specific test for the file size. I
> think that is the cleanest solution. Attached.
It really needs a comment, along the lines of
/*
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> The cases that I think we most need to defend against are
> >>> (A) diff program not found
>
> > In summary, on MinGW, files differ or 'diff' not found, returns 1. If
> > one of the files to be compared does no
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The cases that I think we most need to defend against are
>>> (A) diff program not found
> In summary, on MinGW, files differ or 'diff' not found, returns 1. If
> one of the files to be compared does not exist, it returns 2. And of
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I checked on MinGW and system() just returns the value returned by the
> > > application. There isn't any special two-values-in-one layering like is
> > > done on Unix for wait() and the return value from sy
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I checked on MinGW and system() just returns the value returned by the
> > application. There isn't any special two-values-in-one layering like is
> > done on Unix for wait() and the return value from system(). It seems if
> > the ch
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I checked on MinGW and system() just returns the value returned by the
> application. There isn't any special two-values-in-one layering like is
> done on Unix for wait() and the return value from system(). It seems if
> the child dies from a signal, th
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > *** src/test/regress/pg_regress.c 27 Jul 2006 15:37:19 - 1.16
> > --- src/test/regress/pg_regress.c 28 Jul 2006 19:01:12 -
> > ***
> > *** 813,823
> > * work for inspecting the results of system()
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *** src/test/regress/pg_regress.c 27 Jul 2006 15:37:19 - 1.16
> --- src/test/regress/pg_regress.c 28 Jul 2006 19:01:12 -
> ***
> *** 813,823
>* work for inspecting the results of system(). For the moment,
>
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is very strange.!!
> > boolean ... ok
> > char ... diff command failed with status 1: "diff -w
> > "./expected/char.out"
> > "./results/char.out" >"./results/char.diff""
> > server stoppe
10 matches
Mail list logo
