Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-14 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reply from SCO: Indeed. For inf, infinity, and nan, but not nan(digits), the pointer is left at the trailing matched character instead of the next. Moreover, checking our source history, it has been broken this way for nearly 12 years. Couldn't

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-14 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, May 14, 2004 09:41:58 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reply from SCO: Indeed. For inf, infinity, and nan, but not nan(digits), the pointer is left at the trailing matched character instead of the next. Moreover, checking our

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *** src/Makefile.global.in11 May 2004 21:57:14 - 1.182 --- src/Makefile.global.in13 May 2004 23:03:12 - *** *** 177,182 --- 177,188 CFLAGS += -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations endif

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *** src/Makefile.global.in 11 May 2004 21:57:14 - 1.182 --- src/Makefile.global.in 13 May 2004 23:03:12 - *** *** 177,182 --- 177,188 CFLAGS += -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So we just add the thing in the template file? Yea, I can do that. I did it there because Win32 already had something for libs. Does the template file get included in Makefile.global? I didn't think so. Not the template, the port-specific makefile.

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So we just add the thing in the template file? Yea, I can do that. I did it there because Win32 already had something for libs. Does the template file get included in Makefile.global? I didn't think so. Not the template, the

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 20:11:45 -0400 Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good. I changed my commit to use your version. Thanks! Do we care about regression failures at this stage? I have int4/int8/join failures (join is not new, and is an order issue). the int4/int8 have to do

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 20:49:28 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the int4/int8 have to do with NaN and Infinity i/o. Those we care about. I was hoping CVS tip would Just Work Everywhere on that point, but evidently not :-(. What do you

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does Unixware support NaN/Infinity at all? Yes, we support NaN's and Inf. Hmph. Apparently their strtod() has thought of some original new way to misbehave on those inputs. Would you mind tracing through float4in() or float8in() to see exactly how it

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Tom Lane
Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Where does it leave the ptr pointing to? $ ./test3 ptr=8049682, points to N ptr=8049686, points to f Indeed, they found an original new way to get it wrong. Please point out to them that the ptr is supposed to be advanced *past* the input. Not to the

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] threads stuff/UnixWare

2004-05-13 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Thursday, May 13, 2004 21:35:43 -0400 Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Rosenman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Where does it leave the ptr pointing to? $ ./test3 ptr=8049682, points to N ptr=8049686, points to f Indeed, they found an original new way to get it wrong. Please point out