Re: [PATCHES] -HEAD pg_dumpall broken against older backends

2006-03-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: looks like somebody forgot to test some changes to the pg_dumpall code in Revision 1.70 against 8.1 installations - resulting in the following syntax error: Dump output is never expected to be backward compatible. -- Peter Eisentraut

Re: [PATCHES] -HEAD pg_dumpall broken against older backends

2006-03-29 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: looks like somebody forgot to test some changes to the pg_dumpall code in Revision 1.70 against 8.1 installations - resulting in the following syntax error: Dump output is never expected to be backward compatible. But

Re: [PATCHES] -HEAD pg_dumpall broken against older backends

2006-03-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: looks like somebody forgot to test some changes to the pg_dumpall code in Revision 1.70 against 8.1 installations - resulting in the following syntax error: Dump output is never expected to be backward compatible. We don't

Re: [PATCHES] -HEAD pg_dumpall broken against older backends

2006-03-29 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: looks like somebody forgot to test some changes to the pg_dumpall code in Revision 1.70 against 8.1 installations - resulting in the following syntax error: Dump output is never expected to be backward compatible. yeah - but if you take

Re: [PATCHES] -HEAD pg_dumpall broken against older backends

2006-03-29 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Hi! looks like somebody forgot to test some changes to the pg_dumpall code in Revision 1.70 against 8.1 installations - resulting in the following syntax error: patch applied, thanks andrew ---(end of