Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-12-02 Thread Thomas Baden
--- Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: He seems to have changed this too: - typedef uint32 IpcMemoryKey; + typedef size_t IpcMemoryKey; That really should be a key_t. Yeah, I made it key_t in CVS tip. I'm just wondering what this could avoid

Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-12-02 Thread Kurt Roeckx
creating template1 database in /export/home/tbaden/posttemp/postgresql-7.4/src/test/regress/./tmp_check/data/b+ase/1... FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space left on device DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). HINT: This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk

Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-12-02 Thread Tom Lane
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If that really was the error you got, your patch couldn't have fixed it since it didn't change anything that has something to do with it. I entirely concur with Kurt's observation. My bet is you got the no space left on device failure because you were

Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Baden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi there. My install was failing the regression tests due to a shared memory error. After reviewing the proposed patch, I find it hard to believe that the patch would have fixed any such problem --- even if key_t is 64 bits on your system, the code should

Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-12-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:19:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Thomas Baden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi there. My install was failing the regression tests due to a shared memory error. After reviewing the proposed patch, I find it hard to believe that the patch would have fixed any such

Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-12-01 Thread Tom Lane
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:19:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: After reviewing the proposed patch, I find it hard to believe that the patch would have fixed any such problem --- It's not the key (key_t) that is the problem, but the size, which used to be int

Re: [PATCHES] 7.4 shared memory error on 64-bit SPARC/Solaris 5.8

2003-11-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Thomas Baden wrote: Hi there. My