Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ - IPv6 Fun

2006-05-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Applied. --- Chris Browne wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/OXRS/sources/pgsql-HEAD/doc$ cvs diff -u FAQ_AIX Index: FAQ_AIX === RCS file:

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ

2006-04-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. Backpatched to 8.1.X. --- Chris Browne wrote: Some of this may have already made it in; it's not totally clear... At any rate, here's a revision to CVS HEAD to reflect some changes by myself

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ update

2005-12-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied to CVS HEAD and 8.1.X. Thanks. --- Seneca Cunningham wrote: FAQ_AIX in 8.1.0 contains outdated information about how to deal with postgres problems due to readline. The attached patch replaces that

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Chris Browne wrote: We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 to fail to successfully build the release candidates. However, a patch has emerged (thanks,

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Chris Browne wrote: We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 to fail to successfully build the release candidates. However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to work, and which I'd expect to be portable (better still!). We are still

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Chris Browne wrote: We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 to fail to successfully build the release candidates. However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to work, and which I'd expect to be portable

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Christopher Browne
Chris Browne wrote: We haven't seen any agreement emerge as to what is causing AIX 5.3 ML3 to fail to successfully build the release candidates. However, a patch has emerged (thanks, Seneca!) that does allow it to work, and which I'd expect to be portable (better still!). We are still

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Christopher Browne wrote: Actually, there is a reason NOT to apply the patch in general on all platforms; it introduces logic (an if {} else {} statement) in a place where there wasn't previously one, which *presumably* slows things down somewhat. I don't know if the memcpy() calls are

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ addition

2005-11-04 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, the patch is more than somewhat strange anyway. I don't think it should be applied unless we actually know what's going on. Yeah. Just the first question it raises is: what else is broken, and where? regards, tom

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ update for 5.3 socket address size issue

2005-10-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Chris Browne wrote: IBM has addressed the socket address storage issue as of AIX 5.3 maintenance level 5300-03; the following patch adds documentation to FAQ_AIX... [EMAIL