Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This patch is missing a demonstration that it's actually worth anything.
>> What kind of performance gain do you get?
>>
> 7.4cvs on a 1.13 GHz Intel Celeron mobile, 384 MB RAM, "Severn" RedHat
> Linux 2.4 beta, postmaster -N 30 -B 6
Tom Lane wrote:
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Attached is a patch that aligns large shared memory allocations beyond
MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF. The reason for this is that Intel's cpus have a fast
path for bulk memory copies that only works with aligned addresses.
This patch is missin
Manfred Spraul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attached is a patch that aligns large shared memory allocations beyond
> MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF. The reason for this is that Intel's cpus have a fast
> path for bulk memory copies that only works with aligned addresses.
This patch is missing a demonstration