Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5

2004-08-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Matthew, your reply was exactly the type of reply I would have made in your situation. Your arguments are clear and indisputable. Due to the many large patches the we had to process during this release, we serialized their review. However, I made promises to developers that their patches would

Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5

2004-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well I didn't get out of the office as early as I had hoped, and I have stayed up longer than I had planned, but I have a patch that addresses many of the issues raised by Tom. Please take a look at let me know if I'm heading in the right

Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5

2004-08-05 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Tom Lane wrote: You're headed in the right direction, but I'm afraid we're running out of time. The core committee has chewed this over and agreed that we can't postpone beta for the amount of time we think it will take to make this patch committable. So we're going to hold it over for the 8.1

Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5

2004-08-05 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Tom Lane wrote: Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well I didn't get out of the office as early as I had hoped, and I have stayed up longer than I had planned, but I have a patch that addresses many of the issues raised by Tom. Please take a look at let me know if I'm heading in the

Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum Integration Patch Take 5

2004-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Matthew T. O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, I know people are eager for 8.0, but given that our release cycle is so long, and that by everyones estimates we are at least 3 months away from a release, what is the hurry for beta? If I thought we were just a day or two away from having a