Good patch. You are right that the original code did not consider that
AUTOCOMMIT would change the transaction state seen by the
ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK check.
Fixed in CVS. ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK was not in 8.0.X so no need to backpatch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Paesold wrote:
> There is a bug in psql for the new ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK feature. In AUTOCOMMIT
> off mode it does not work correctly for the first statement.
>
> This is how it works usually:
> ====================================
> postgres=# \set AUTOCOMMIT off
> postgres=# \set ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK interactive
> postgres=# SELECT 1;
> ?column?
> ----------
> 1
> (1 row)
>
> postgres=# SELECT a;
> ERROR: column "a" does not exist
> postgres=# SELECT 1;
> ?column?
> ----------
> 1
> (1 row)
>
> postgres=# BEGIN;
> WARNING: there is already a transaction in progress
> BEGIN
> postgres=# ROLLBACK;
> ROLLBACK
> ====================================
>
> For the first statement in a transaction after the implicit BEGIN it does
> not work:
> ====================================
> postgres=# ROLLBACK;
> ROLLBACK
> postgres=#
> postgres=# SELECT a;
> ERROR: column "a" does not exist
> postgres=# SELECT 1;
> ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of
> transaction block
> ====================================
>
> With the attaced patch it works correctly even for the first statement.
> ====================================
> postgres=# \set AUTOCOMMIT off
> postgres=# \set ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK interactive
> postgres=# SELECT a;
> ERROR: column "a" does not exist
> postgres=# SELECT 1;
> ?column?
> ----------
> 1
> (1 row)
>
> postgres=# BEGIN;
> WARNING: there is already a transaction in progress
> BEGIN
> postgres=# ABORT;
> ROLLBACK
> ====================================
>
> Please check the patch and apply to CVS tip.
> I think it would be good to add regression tests for AUTOCOMMIT and
> ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK and possibly others. There are currently no regression
> tests specifically for psql features, but since the regression tests are
> executed via psql, there would be no problem in creating a set of such
> tests, right?. I could write some.
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Paesold
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Index: src/bin/psql/common.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/bin/psql/common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.104
diff -c -c -r1.104 common.c
*** src/bin/psql/common.c 22 Jun 2005 21:14:30 -0000 1.104
--- src/bin/psql/common.c 20 Sep 2005 21:41:45 -0000
***************
*** 1010,1022 ****
return false;
}
PQclear(results);
}
! else if (transaction_status == PQTRANS_INTRANS &&
! (rollback_str = GetVariable(pset.vars,
"ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK")) != NULL &&
! /* !off and !interactive is 'on' */
! pg_strcasecmp(rollback_str, "off") != 0 &&
! (pset.cur_cmd_interactive ||
! pg_strcasecmp(rollback_str, "interactive") != 0))
{
if (on_error_rollback_warning == false && pset.sversion < 80000)
{
--- 1010,1024 ----
return false;
}
PQclear(results);
+ transaction_status = PQtransactionStatus(pset.db);
}
!
! if (transaction_status == PQTRANS_INTRANS &&
! (rollback_str = GetVariable(pset.vars, "ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK")) !=
NULL &&
! /* !off and !interactive is 'on' */
! pg_strcasecmp(rollback_str, "off") != 0 &&
! (pset.cur_cmd_interactive ||
! pg_strcasecmp(rollback_str, "interactive") != 0))
{
if (on_error_rollback_warning == false && pset.sversion < 80000)
{
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
